Skip to main content

TRIZ Models & Tools :


TRIZ Tool : Structured Problem Solving

What is Structured Problem Solving?
Structured problem solving provides a systematic approach to advance from the identification of a problem to the solution.
Step-by-Step Process
1.    Define Problem :
Purpose
       Identify the problem and the importance of working on it
Output
       Establish a team
       Develop Problem Statement

2.    Current Solution :
Purpose
       Clarify the problem areas as the situation exists today
Output
       Create a problem description

3.    Identify Causes :
Purpose
       Identify and verify the root causes of the problem
Output
       Isolate and verify the root cause of the problem

4.    Develop Solution :
Purpose
       Develop and test solutions to eliminate the root cause
Output
       Fix the problem at the root cause level
       Generate no additional problems

5.    Implement Solution :
Purpose
       Implement and validate corrective actions
Output
       Implementation plan, risks and barriers identified
       Validate that corrective action is working

6.    Standardize Solution :
Purpose
       Ensure that improvements are sustained over time
Output
       Solutions proliferated to similar equipment and processes

7.    Next Steps :
Purpose
       Evaluate accomplishments and lessons learned
Output
       Document post-mortem
       Update documentation
       Publish report and findings


What is a Contradiction?
Contradiction is the opposition between two conflicting forces or ideas



                        The Contradiction Matrix
     Also known as Altshuller’s Matrix.
     Used to generate potential Inventive Principles based on the improving and worsening parameters from the Engineering Contradiction.
     As for Physical Contradictions, there is an algorithm in terms of a set of questions to guide the user to determine which option to use.
     Once option chosen, a list of inventive Principles can be referenced as 
    potential solutions.

                        Physical Contradiction
     Physical Contradiction is applied when we are dealing with contradiction s with a single parameter or manipulative variable, which creates a contradiction at two different values.

Examples:
     Airplane wing needs to have large surface for easy takeoff and small surface for fast speeds.
     Airplane landing gear needs to be present during landing but does not need to be present during flight to reduce wind resistance.
     Login form for user access web system need to be present but does not need once user’s already logged to account.

The physical contradictions can be solved through the following methods:
   i.   Separation in Space, Time, Relation System Level
 ii.   Satisfaction

iii.   Bypass


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

What is Trimming?

·       Trimming is a method of eliminating Components from an Engineering System to reduce or eliminate the disadvantages of those trimmed Components ·       Trimming is used to increase the efficiency and reduce the cost of the Engineering System Example :

Implement Product Analysis :

Product Analysis : Component Analysis Component is an identifiable Object that make up a part of an Engineering System Interaction Analysis Interaction Analysis is an analytical tool that identifies and understands the interaction between the components of the Engineering System Function Analysis Function Model is an analysis of the interaction between components of the Engineering System and Supersystem.   It identifies the advantages and disadvantages of the functions acting on each of the components. Structural Analysis  

Cause and Effect Chain Analysis :

·    A cause-and-effect analysis generates hypotheses about possible causes(reasons) and effects(results) of problems ·    A Cause & Effect Chain (CEC) analysis diagram is a structured way of expressing hypothesis about the causes of a problem or about why something is not happening as desired ·    It helps to focus attention on the process where a problem is occurring and to allow for constructive use of facts to narrow down on the actual causes ·    It cannot replace empirical testing of these hypotheses, it does not tell which is the root cause, but rather the possibilities Example :